Blog

[IVY] When AI summarises information, Ivy interprets the context of the work

How Ivy differs from general AI

Why you search again after researching with AI

Even when sentences are arranged naturally, it is difficult to determine whether the result can be used directly for work. Official sources and personal opinions must be distinguished, and it must be possible to verify whether the information is still valid. When different sources conflict, the selected criteria and basis for the judgement should also be presented.

Criteria to check when using the results of work-related research
Items to checkWhat to reviewProblems that arise when verification is difficult
SourcesDistinguishing between official sources, statistics, press releases and personal opinionsDifficulty in assessing the reliability of the information
RecencyThe date the material was created and whether it is currently validChanged policies or outdated figures may be used
AccessibilityWhether reference links work properly and whether the original source can be checkedIt may be difficult for users to verify the basis of the answer directly
Consistency between sourcesDifferences between figures and claims in different sourcesIt may be unclear which information should be used as the basis for judgement
Relevance to the workThe direct relevance of the research purpose to the resultsThe materials need to be reclassified and organised

How IVY verifies evidence

IVY works with materials in various formats, including text, images and videos, and uses search assistance and tool-based information retrieval. Along with the research results, it provides the materials referenced, links that can be checked, and the criteria used to connect the materials. Users can check the necessary original sources themselves and decide whether to use the research results.

Ivy's answer process

The scope and depth of the materials change the results

It is difficult to understand the overall flow using only the materials at the top of search results and some news articles. Even on the same topic, the scope and perspectives of information provided by companies, public institutions, research institutions, the media and practitioners differ. IVY reviews multiple types of materials together and summarises common trends, differences, causes of change and impacts on work.

Examples of questions for Ivy

ARI, connecting repeated research to workflows

Industry news, policy announcements, competitor products and price changes need to be checked again at set intervals. When the person responsible enters search terms and categorises materials each time, time is repeatedly spent on the same task. IVY’s ARI supports carrying out the research and organisation process according to specified schedules and conditions.

  1. Set an execution schedule, such as 9 am every Monday.
  2. Collect the latest materials related to the industries, policies and technologies of interest.
  3. Categorise the materials by topic and importance.
  4. Identify changes by comparing them with the results of previous research.
  5. Organise the sources and reference links for the materials.
  6. Generate a draft report for the person responsible to review.
Division of roles in repetitive research processes
ComponentIVY’s roleARI’s rolePerson responsible’s role
Material researchSearch for and organise relevant materialsExecute according to specified schedules and conditionsSet the research scope and criteria
Information categorisationAnalyse relationships and differences by topicApply a repeatable categorisation processConfirm the importance of the task
Result preparationCompile research findings with supporting evidenceGenerate and deliver a draft reportReview the content and make the final judgement

Work research that can be checked and used

The value of AI research in the workplace should be assessed based on generation speed, the verifiability of sources, the currency of information, the criteria used for interpretation and its ability to connect to follow-up tasks. These criteria can be applied to market research, policy reviews, technical research, customer analysis, proposal writing and internal knowledge searches. IVY finds the necessary materials, retains the supporting evidence and provides results organised for the purpose of the work.

Evaluation criteriaQuestions to check
Evidence verificationCan the referenced original text and sources be checked directly?
Information currencyHas material that is valid at the current point in time been retrieved?
Contextual interpretationHave the differences between the materials and their impact on the work been organised?
Use of resultsIs it in a form that can be used for meetings, reports, proposals and decision-making?
Connection to workCan it lead to regular research and follow-up tasks?
  • IVY
  • ARI
  • Business research
  • Market research
  • Evidence verification
  • Research automation
Back to newsroom
CLEVI

Language and region

Machine-translated languages are marked. Availability follows the published site bundle.

136 languages

Recommended

1

East Asia

7

Southeast Asia

11

South Asia

18

Central Asia

5

Middle East and the Caucasus

10

Western and Southern Europe

16

Britain and Ireland

4

Northern Europe and the Baltics

10

Central Europe and the Balkans

14

Eastern Europe

5

East Africa and the Horn

8

West and Central Africa

9

Southern Africa

8

The Americas

5

The Pacific

5