Beyond simple autocomplete:
an AI agent that does real software engineering work

It understands developer intent and works across the entire lifecycle—from planning and coding to debugging, refactoring, and documentation.

Every AI coding step, from generation through testing and validation, is logged and auditable.

Developers came to build. Why do they spend more time reading code?

Repetitive work drains engineering capacity

Repetitive coding, testing, and maintenance fragment developer focus and consume time meant for core work.

Understanding legacy code takes too long

À mesure que les projets prennent de l’ampleur, le coût de la découverte et de la compréhension du code ainsi que de l’intégration augmente. Les nouveaux membres de l’équipe mettent trop de temps à apporter des contributions significatives.

You cannot explain what the AI did

Conventional AI coding tools show only the result. They do not reveal why the code was created or trace how the work was performed, making them a poor fit for enterprise audit and security policies.

Core Coding Agent capabilities

Natural-language code generation

Describe the code you need in plain language. Coding Agent understands the project context and generates code that follows the existing style. You can set the scope anywhere from a single function to an entire module.

Project-wide code analysis and discovery

It indexes the full codebase and maps its structure. Even across hundreds of thousands of legacy lines, it quickly identifies dependencies, call flows, and key modules to shorten onboarding.

Modifications et refactorisation du code

Il va au-delà des simples modifications pour améliorer la qualité, les performances et la lisibilité du code. Les changements sont présentés clairement, et le code concerné est examiné en parallèle.

Test generation and execution

After writing code, it generates and runs tests immediately. For failures, it analyzes the cause and iterates on a fix, automating the full path to better coverage.

Analyse des erreurs et mesures correctives

It analyzes error messages and stack traces to identify root causes, then recommends structural improvements that prevent recurrence—not just a one-off patch.

Git workflow support

Il crée des branches, rédige des messages de commit et prépare des descriptions de demandes de tirage, en s’intégrant naturellement sans modifier votre flux de travail Git existant.

Laissez l’IA détecter les problèmes avant leur mise en production.
src/Clevi.Product/Order/Services/OrderApprovalService.cs
JD junior.dev Pull request · Just now
Improve order approval API performance

Inventaire consolidé et validation de l’état des paiements dans ApproveAsync(). The flow also emits an admin notification event after approval.

Réviser l’IA Révision de code existant · Détection automatique

[BUG] order.Payment est nul pour une commande, mais le code y accède directement order.Payment.Status. A pending or manually approved order could therefore cause the approval API to fail with a NullReferenceException.

return order.Payment != null
    && order.Payment.Status == PaymentStatus.Paid
    && order.StockReserved;
Confidence: 88% · Impact: Order approval / Admin notification event
SR senior.dev Senior review · In progress

As Review AI noted, some orders have no payment information. Add a null check and include a manual-approval test case in OrderApprovalServiceTests.

Révision des demandes d’extraction par l’IA

The moment a developer opens a pull request, Review AI analyzes the changes. It flags risky code in the actual project files and leaves actionable suggestions between the existing code review and senior review.

Standardized review criteria

Apply consistent review standards across the organization instead of relying on individual reviewers. Pull requests are automatically checked against internal conventions, architecture principles, and security policies.

Fewer review bottlenecks

AI handles repetitive mechanical checks first, freeing developers to focus on design decisions and critical logic. Senior review workload falls while delivery speeds up.

AI that performs the work—not just recommends code

Assign coding work in one natural-language sentence

Give an implementation, refactoring, or bug-fix request in natural language. Coding Agent understands the existing code context and handles the work from planning through validation—not merely completion.

It analyzes and understands the entire project structure

It analyzes the full internal codebase and works from that context, accelerating legacy-code discovery, onboarding, and dependency analysis.

It automates testing from authoring through execution

After a code change, it automatically generates tests, runs them, and analyzes errors, reducing testing time while supporting consistent quality.

It works inside your real development workflow

Les opérations Git, la gestion des branches et la rédaction des messages de validation s’intègrent naturellement à l’environnement de développement existant, sans nouveau flux de travail à apprendre.

Voyez exactement ce que l’IA a fait, chaque fois que vous en avez besoin.

Coding Agent logs the entire work process: who issued each instruction, how the AI reasoned, and how the output was produced.

Full-process logging

Every step—from the natural-language instruction to code changes and test execution—is timestamped and available for later review.

Trace who issued each instruction

Administrators can review AI usage, instructions, and generated code by team member, with role-based access controls that enforce security policy.

Audit the evidence behind AI decisions

Evidence explaining why the AI produced the code and which context informed its decision is stored for code review and post-event audit.

AUDIT LOG · Example live work history
[2026-05-14 02:31:04]  @kim.developer  → "Refactor the payment module and write tests"  ✓ Complete
[2026-05-14 02:31:05]  Coding Agent  → Analyse de payment.service.ts → Refactorisation de trois fonctions
[2026-05-14 02:31:48]  Coding Agent  → Generated 12 tests → Result: 12/12 passed  ✓ Validation complete
[2026-05-14 09:15:22]  @lee.manager  → Open audit record for this task  → Full history available, including decision-evidence logs
How is Coding Agent different from existing AI coding tools?

Autocomplete tools and agentic AI are fundamentally different. Coding Agent is not a tool that recommends code; it is an agent that performs software engineering work.

Comparaison GitHub Copilot / Cursor General AI coding tool Coding Agent
How work is performedCode suggestions · AutocompleteGénération d’un seul fichierPlanning, execution, and validation
Project-context awarenessLimited (current file only)LimitedFull-codebase analysis
Automated testing and validationNot supportedNot supportedGeneration, execution, and error correction
Audit logsNoneNoneComplete work history
Suivi des éléments probants des décisions de l’IANoneNoneAuditable with decision evidence
On-premises deploymentUnavailable (cloud only)LimitedPrise en charge complète sur site
Long-running workOne-off responseOne-off responseBuilt on an agentic architecture
Permission and access managementIndividual onlyLimitedGestion par équipe et par rôle
Le marché des agents de codage IA est déjà en mouvement
$4B
Global AI coding-agent market in 2025
$147.8B
Projected market size in 2034
55%
Compound annual growth rate (CAGR)

The era of code-suggestion tools is giving way

Les premiers outils de codage par IA se concentraient sur la saisie semi-automatique. Le marché évolue rapidement vers une IA agentique qui comprend les projets dans leur ensemble et prend en charge le travail de la planification aux tests et à la validation.

For enterprise adoption, security matters as much as performance

Les institutions financières, les organismes du secteur public et les grandes entreprises sont de plus en plus préoccupés par l’IA SaaS externe. Les environnements de développement sur site, les journaux d’audit et la gestion des accès deviennent des exigences déterminantes.

Foire aux questions
GitHub Copilot and Cursor are tools centred on autocomplete and one-off generation.
Coding Agent performs the full process, from planning through coding, testing, validation, and error correction.
The key differences are its ability to understand the whole project, carry out long-running work, and record every step in an auditable log.
The log timestamps who issued each natural-language instruction, what code the AI generated or changed, the evidence behind its decisions, and every test result.
Administrators can review and export the complete AI usage history for each team member.
Yes. Coding Agent supports fully on-premises deployment.
Le code et les données restent dans votre environnement, avec les mêmes fonctionnalités disponibles sur un réseau interne.
It can be deployed in financial institutions, public agencies, and enterprises with strict security policies.
It integrates with major development environments, including VS Code and JetBrains IDEs.
It fits into Git-based workflows without requiring changes to the existing development process.
Our technical team assists with environment setup during implementation.
Coding Agent supports major languages including Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Kotlin, and Swift.
Language coverage continues to expand. Contact us if your organization requires a particular language.
Coding Agent supports role-based access management.
AI usage scope and audit access can be separated for developers, senior engineers, team leads, administrators, and other roles.
Team-level usage-history reports are also available.
Les tableaux de bord utilisent les journaux d’audit pour afficher l’adoption de l’IA par équipe, le nombre de tâches automatisées, le temps d’ingénierie économisé et d’autres indicateurs.
Comparez la productivité avant et après l’adoption pour mesurer le retour sur investissement.

Même maintenant,
the development-speed gap keeps widening.

CLEVI

Language and region

Machine-translated languages are marked. Availability follows the published site bundle.

136 languages

Recommended

1

East Asia

7

Southeast Asia

11

South Asia

18

Central Asia

5

Middle East and the Caucasus

10

Western and Southern Europe

16

Britain and Ireland

4

Northern Europe and the Baltics

10

Central Europe and the Balkans

14

Eastern Europe

5

East Africa and the Horn

8

West and Central Africa

9

Southern Africa

8

The Americas

5

The Pacific

5