Blog

[IVY] When AI summarises information, Ivy interprets the context of the work

How Ivy differs from general AI

Why you search again after researching with AI

Even when sentences are organised naturally, it is difficult to conclude that the result can be used directly for work. Official sources and personal opinions must be distinguished, and it should be possible to verify whether the information is still valid. When different sources conflict, the criteria selected and the basis for the judgement should also be provided.

Criteria to check when using work research results
Item to verifyWhat to reviewProblems that arise when verification is difficult
SourceDistinction between official sources, statistics, press releases and personal opinionsDifficulty in judging the reliability level of the information
RecencyThe date the material was created and whether it is currently validChanged policies or outdated figures may be used
AccessibilityWhether the reference link works properly and whether the original source can be checkedIt may be difficult for users to verify the basis of the answer directly
Consistency across sourcesDifferences between different figures and claimsIt is unclear which information should be used as the basis for judgement
Suitability for workDirect relevance to the research purpose and resultsThe material needs to be reclassified and organised

How IVY verifies evidence

IVY handles materials in various formats, including text, images and videos, and uses search assistance and tool-based information retrieval. Along with the research results, it provides the sources referenced, links that can be checked and the criteria used to connect the materials. Users can check the original sources they need directly and decide whether to use the research results.

Ivy's answer process

The scope and depth of the materials change the results

It is difficult to understand the overall flow using only the materials at the top of search results and some news articles. Even on the same topic, the scope and perspectives of information provided by companies, public institutions, research institutions, the media and practitioners differ. IVY reviews multiple types of materials together and summarises common trends, differences, the causes of changes and their impact on work.

Examples of questions for Ivy

Connecting repetitive research to workflows with ARI

Industry news, policy announcements, competitor products and price changes need to be checked again at set intervals. When the person in charge enters search terms and categorises materials each time, time is repeatedly spent on the same task. IVY’s ARI supports carrying out the research and organisation process according to specified schedules and conditions.

  1. Set an execution schedule, such as 9:00 am every Monday.
  2. Collect the latest materials related to the industries, policies and technologies of interest.
  3. Categorise the materials by topic and importance.
  4. Identify changes by comparing them with the results of previous research.
  5. Organise the sources and reference links for the materials.
  6. Generate a draft report for the person in charge to review.
Role allocation in the recurring research process
ComponentsIVY’s roleARI’s rolePerson in charge’s role
Material researchSearch for relevant materials and organise their contentExecute according to specified schedules and conditionsSet the research scope and criteria
Information classificationAnalyse relationships and differences by topicApply a repeatable classification processConfirm work priorities
Result preparationCompile research findings with supporting evidenceGenerate and deliver a draft reportReview the content and make the final decision

Work research that can be verified and used

The usefulness of AI research in business should be evaluated together based on generation speed, the ability to verify sources, the recency of information, interpretation criteria and the connection to follow-up tasks. These criteria can be applied to market research, policy reviews, technology research, customer analysis, proposal preparation and internal knowledge searches. IVY finds the required materials, retains the supporting evidence and provides results organised according to the purpose of the work.

Evaluation criteriaQuestions to verify
Evidence verificationCan the original sources and references used be checked directly?
Information recencyWas material that is valid at the present time retrieved?
Context interpretationHave the differences in the materials and their impact on the work been organised?
Result utilisationIs it in a format that can be used for meetings, reports, proposals and decision-making?
Work connectionCan it lead to regular research and follow-up tasks?
  • IVY
  • ARI
  • Business Research
  • Market Research
  • Verify Sources
  • Research Automation
Back to newsroom
CLEVI

Language and region

Machine-translated languages are marked. Availability follows the published site bundle.

136 languages

Recommended

1

East Asia

7

Southeast Asia

11

South Asia

18

Central Asia

5

Middle East and the Caucasus

10

Western and Southern Europe

16

Britain and Ireland

4

Northern Europe and the Baltics

10

Central Europe and the Balkans

14

Eastern Europe

5

East Africa and the Horn

8

West and Central Africa

9

Southern Africa

8

The Americas

5

The Pacific

5
[IVY] When AI summarises information, Ivy interprets the context of the work — CLEVI